When a layman has to preach a sermon, I think he is most likely to be useful, or even interesting, if he starts exactly from where he is himself, not so much presuming to instruct as comparing notes.
Read more on and from 
Recent Posts
-
Selling Out to Keep It Real: Indie Currency in the Decade(s) of Dysfunction
-
And I Was Alive (With a Shard of Glass in the Gut): A Week with Christian Wiman
-
Culture, Language and the Tower of Babel
-
New Music: Vampire Weekend’s Modern Vampires of the City
-
PZ’s Podcast: Girl Can’t Help It and Old Man River
-
Another Week Ends: Techno-Fasting, Google Glass, Tiger Babies, Missional Burnouts, Serrano’s Backfire, Powell’s Joy, and Family Tree
-
Death and Life in the Artist’s Studio – Dan Siedell
-
A New Pentecost, or Maybe Just a Rhetorical Revival, According to Peanuts
-
The Gospel According to The Office
-
For Those Who Love Poorly: Forgiveness in The Woodsman & Around the Bend
5 comments
Drake says:
Feb 10, 2010
Thanks StampDawg. What a good thought.
Aaron M. G. Zimmerman says:
Feb 10, 2010
What does he say about when a clergyman has to preach a sermon?
StampDawg says:
Feb 10, 2010
I think the "layman" qualification is just CSL's characteristic humility. The quote is the opening line from a sermon he preached (and of course he's a layman).
Personally I think it's a good thing for folks with collars to consider as well. Every sermon needs to be rooted in God's word, of course, but if it's not also rooted in the preacher's concrete personal experience I suspect it will fail to connect.
Michael says:
Feb 11, 2010
Frankly, I think _most_ sermons would be far better off taking this approach: simply sharing something God has been teaching the speaker, or something the speaker has been reflecting on or wrestling with.
Even better, I'd love to hear some open-ended sermons: messages that leave us with more questions than answers, that drive us to our knees in wonder and desire to simply know God better.
Less pointing fingers. More sharing of the journey.
dpotter says:
Feb 11, 2010
reminds me of phillips brooks' definition of preaching: 'truth through personality'
…there is a terrible temptation among young clergy (i speak from first-hand experience) to imitate preachers we most admire, but i think it always comes across as forced and inauthentic…whenever i hear other people trying to mimic another's mannerisms, i tend to tune out.