From David “Pink Tie” Brooks at the NY Times:
This is basically another way of saying that the Law does not produce what it commands. Or that exhortative sermons don’t work. Or that Christian bookstores will not solve your problems. Or that nagging the person you live with is a failed project. Which is why we need a Savior. Think about that the next time you feeling like giving advice.
Sign up for the Mockingbird Newsletter
COMMENTS
3 responses to “Moral Reasoning: A Dead End?”
Leave a Reply
Apart from his conclusion that all morality is biological, this is a gem of an article! thanks for drawing attention to it.
“The emotions are, in fact, in charge of the temple of morality, and … moral reasoning is really just a servant masquerading as a high priest.”
So much for Socratic interpretations of “take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ” and “be transformed by the renewing of your mind.”
incredible post
will be using in a sermon sometime soon
The problem is that the urge to “give advice” is no more rational than any other desire. So, it may be good advice not to give advice, but it always falls on deaf ears when the urge hits. Love doesn’t “give advice” in the sense of thinking that its own urging can change anything. Where love is, advice is not. Dylan wrote a song about this: “Love Minus Zero, No Limit.” My advice is, listen to that song one million times!