Strictly speaking, casuistry is a case-based system of flexible moral reasoning which relies upon abstract methods in order to achieve an ‘optimal solution’ to a dilemma.
The video speaks to the very problem with this sort of arbitrary, human reasoning (as opposed to definite laws which are given by God) because no such human-derived solution exists, nor does life work this way. What usually happens in life is that we (the sinner) minimise and rearrange the facts of life to suit ourselves–thus the growing tattoo!
Historically, casuistry fell into great disfavor after Pascal criticised what he felt was the permissiveness of Jesuit casuistry and perhaps more than any other book, Luther’s ‘Bondage of the Will‘ uprooted the idea that the human will is autonomous or qualified to be a rational, moral guide…he also took issue with the practice of confession since he felt that it focused too much on the externals of sin and missed the spiritual component. (This was what I meant in the psychadelic kitty vid by the way–Jesus knew that appearances are always deceiving, the human is an iceberg with 90% of themselves submerged from view). Aristotle, on the other hand, was a proponent of casuistry and much of this sort of reasoning can be found/avoided in his Nicomachean Ethics.














5 comments
Sean Norris says:
Mar 24, 2009
Hilarious!
Jacob Smith says:
Mar 24, 2009
Great Post. It is also important to note that Aquinas was a huge fan of Aristotle’s ethic. He incorporated much of it into his writings like suma con Gentiles and suma theologica, and hence Casuistry became the predominate mode of thinking in Christianity.
dpotter says:
Mar 24, 2009
Yes, totally Jacob…I forgot about Aquinas.
John Stamper says:
Mar 24, 2009
Luther against Aristotle:
39. We are not masters of our actions, from beginning to end, but servants. This in opposition to the philosophers.
40. We do not become righteous by doing righteous deeds but, having been made righteous, we do righteous deeds. This in opposition to the philosophers.
41. Virtually the entire Ethics of Aristotle is the worst enemy of grace. This in opposition to the scholastics.
42. It is an error to maintain that Aristotle’s statement concerning happiness does not contradict Catholic doctrine. This in opposition to the doctrine on morals.
43. It is an error to say that no man can become a theologian without Aristotle. This in opposition to common opinion.
44. Indeed, no one can become a theologian unless he becomes one without Aristotle.
…
50. Briefly, the whole of Aristotle is to theology as darkness is to light. This in opposition to the scholastics.
dpotter says:
Mar 24, 2009
Great quotes John…thanks for tracking those down for us.